Disclaimer
What ClinicalVitals is, what it is not, and how the feedback and stations are produced. Please read it before you rely on anything here.
We are not the AMC, and we are not connected to it
ClinicalVitals is independent, third-party educational software. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, accredited by, licensed by, or connected in any way to the Australian Medical Council (AMC), the Medical Board of Australia, AHPRA, and the PESCI providers it accredits, the General Medical Council (GMC), or any other examining body or regulator. We name the AMC only to say which exam this app helps you practise for.
Nothing here guarantees you a pass
Using this platform, sitting stations, or scoring well on them does not guarantee a pass in a pre-employment structured clinical interview or any other assessment. Almost every mark you see here is produced automatically by software. The one exception is a human review, an optional add-on you buy against a single station, which is one ClinicalVitals reviewer’s opinion given for teaching — they are not an examiner of record for any examining body. Both are indicative practice feedback: not an official result, not a moderated one, and not a prediction of how you will be marked on the day.
AI feedback, with clear limitations
ClinicalVitals uses AI to provide rapid practice feedback. Your consultation is transcribed by speech-recognition software and the transcript is marked by a language model against the ClinicalVitals feedback rubric. AI-generated feedback can occasionally be incorrect or incomplete, and speech recognition can occasionally mis-hear a word. Use it as a preparation aid rather than as a substitute for official the AMC information, clinical guidelines or professional education. If a mark looks wrong, the problem button on the scorecard tells us, and a human review is available on any marked station.
How our stations are developed
Each station starts from a brief — usually a scenario candidates have described sitting in the real exam. A language model writes the first draft; the founder, an IMG who has sat the exam, edits it in the station editor. Every save is checked by software against the catalogue's structural rules and for terminology from the wrong exam, and a second model reads the station as an examiner would and lists clinical concerns for the founder to act on. The founder sets the difficulty (Foundation, Intermediate or Advanced) and approves the station, at which point it goes live; nothing reaches a candidate unapproved. Stations are updated when candidates report a problem or when guidance changes. There is currently no independent clinical review panel, and we do not claim one.
A practice tool, not clinical training
This app exists for self-assessment, speaking a consultation out loud, and getting used to the clock. It is not a substitute for formal clinical training, supervised practice, a preparation course, or the official curricula, rubrics and guidelines you are actually examined against. Read those from their source.
Not medical advice
The patients, histories, examination findings, investigations, diagnostic pathways, management plans and voice interactions in this app are computer-generated for exam simulation, and can be confidently wrong. None of it is medical advice, and none of it may be relied on for real patient care or clinical decision-making. If you are treating a patient, use your own judgement and current Australian guidelines.
Version 2026-09-29. Questions about any of this? Use the contact button in the corner of any page.